gre写作的丢分点盘点

你知道你在哪里丢了gre写作分数吗?下面小编就和大家分享gre写作的丢分点盘点，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre写作的丢分点盘点

1. gre写作丢分点之论证不足

gre考试写作Argument即驳论文，需要对题干进行全面的审查，找到原文中论述的一些逻辑漏洞加以攻击。查找漏洞，提出论点，阐述论证确立自己的观点的过程就叫做论证。换句话说，论证就是用一个或一些已知为真的判断确定另一个判断的真实性的思维过程。所谓论证过程，就是用严格的逻辑规则由论据得出论点的过程。所以，如果论点的得出过程理由不够充分，或论点总结不够准确，这篇文章的论证过程就是不严谨的。

gre写作虽然主要是针对逻辑错误进行攻击和论证，但只是理论上的论述会显得文章死板，不易理解，适当的举例会让论证显得更加具有说服力，同时也能丰富文章内容，提升文章的可读性。

2. gre写作丢分点之缺少论据

gre写作要求考生论证充分，论据有力，考生基本上都能够针对找出的逻辑错误进行充分论证，但是缺少例子和细节，文章说理就会显得十分苍白无力，所以gre写作分数不高，也有可能是这份不造成的。

论据就是为论点提供的证据，通过论据，可以加深论点的准确性，使论点更加准确，更加能够让人信服。所以考生要在文章中尽量做到细节的丰富和量化，很多时候细致的例子能够弥补遣词造句上的不足。具体应做到以下几点：

1)论据要来源于生活，要具有生动的论述效果。不能过于空洞，也不能脱离现时，否则就失去了举例的意义。

2)要客观表达。虽然来源于身边社会，但不能主观臆断。

3) gre写作中举例常见的表达方式如for example,/for instance, (后加句子)Such as/ like(后加词组)，Take... as an example, A case in point is that...等。

3. gre写作丢分点之逻辑混乱

考生在进行gre写作之前，一定要先把题干弄明白，准确找出题干中的逻辑错误，然后再进行下一步的写作，这对于把握gre写作的文章内容和逻辑思维非常重要。考生需要审好题，审清题在很大程度上关系到整篇文章的成败，绝不可以掉以轻心。不仅要仔细研究题目，还要结合gre写作常见的逻辑七宗罪进行仔细分析。首先要明确文章要写的内容，这是保证整篇文章切题的关键;其次，确定文章所需的主语人称，人称混乱是中国考生常犯的一个错误;第三，注意文章对动词的时态、语气的特殊要求。

gre写作更注重的是文章的整体感觉，从备考指导中的高分作文范例可以看出，即使整个论述只有1条主线，只要前后联接得自然流畅，并能一步一步引导读者向结论靠近，就是好文章。增强gre写作的逻辑性考生可以从以下几个方面入手：

1) 掌控题目中的逻辑链。这是gre写作的根本，也是前提。

2)根据逻辑漏洞的个数列出文章的主要提纲。这样既能体现出文章结构的清晰，又能在内容上体现出详略得当，顺序合理。

3)根据所列提纲进行逻辑论证时重中之重。

GRE作文范文：如何避免偏激

Most people often look for similarities, even between very differentthings, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thingshould be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compareit to something else.

GRE作文范文参考：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things inan effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds ofcomplex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studyingthe objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the sameas before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction.From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion andorder can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meetsomething new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites withother familiar things and classify it according to those attributes.Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us withan outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon.Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms andstyles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can befound. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance,one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems tobe meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be takeninto consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparisonwould be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operationwe can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, howit is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities notonly refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similarrelationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using thestrategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of arelationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understandingand when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, iftold that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that betweenbook and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can takeon window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristicsof a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding.Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed andwell-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Stilltake window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it istransparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs thefunction as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, andsometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and furtherunderstanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besidesthose it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-orientedmodel,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as thecore and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put intosame “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined,discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics.This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and overagain on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life,starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to graspdistinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we shouldalways bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness andefficiency.

GRE作文范文：想法付诸行动的困难

Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents mustserve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today'sworld.

GRE作文范文参考：

In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that ismarginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts thatanything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practicalis the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going toofar to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against theempirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the humansociety forward.

Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often dowe hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make importantdecisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted causeunderlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, theemphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and soforth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century whenwar, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period.People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions restedupon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the commonwell being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.

This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval thatour human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect ofthings in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty,hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work outpractical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a personwould possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to makesensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practicalconsideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of theprospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power andintellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pureideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom tofailure.

Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol inour society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practicalhas little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated tothe place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so muchachievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting forequality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicalityis the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophicalexplanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimatevalue of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon thepractical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important partof our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we havea clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the resultwould be more satisfactory and valuable.

To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance ofpracticality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society andit does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, nomatter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claimingthat it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this ideasince in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophicalexplanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect,idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration.Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed byeconomic profit and quick fame and recognition.