GRE写作提分技巧2020合辑介绍 gre写作介绍

GRE写作备考，大家可以通过对比自己写作的成果和题库对应题目的高分范文来审视自己的GRE写作有没有进步，是否高分。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作8个提分技巧汇总介绍,希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作8个提分技巧汇总介绍

GRE写作提高技巧一：研究GRE作文范文

必须研究范文，尤其是5分和6分的范文，他们真的非常重要，因为那是最权威的辅导资料。研究也不是简单的熟读和背诵，而是逐字逐句体会作者的意思及修辞。还有提醒一点，ETS对范文的评论也都非常精彩，建议大家参考。这会非常有利于理解考试所考的重点。

GRE写作提高技巧二：养成GRE作文逻辑思维

必须要熟练，重要的是形成惯性思维，考试时间真的很紧张，要想现场思考每句话的调理性难度太高，写得时候手指不停运转，远远超过了大脑运转速度。只有有充分思维准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。题目中提到politics，大脑中就应当出现FranklinRoosevelt， Lincoln， Gerhard Schroeder， Gandhi。提到ART，就该想到Rembrandt， Van Gogh，Starry night， night watch， Hemmingway， the old man and the sea;提到Scandal，就该想到Nixon，Watergate，bill Clinton，sex sandal，Enron。总之，熟练是非常非常重要的!

GRE写作提高技巧三：积极改写GRE作文

必须多修改，如果不勤修改自己的文章，就不知道自己原来的漏洞和不足在哪。闷头写只能导致lose the stake!当认真学习一段时间写作之后，再回头改第一篇习作，肯定会发现自己很多毛病，这说明：你在进步!

GRE写作提高技巧四：从别人的GRE作文上吸取经验

必须学习别人的文章，不管是高分满分作文，还是平时练手之作，都是非常宝贵的学习，参考资料，看到别人的文章和写作思路，是提高自己水平的有效途径。建议大家看看各类写作内容，真的会受益匪浅。

GRE写作提高技巧五：多思考多动脑

必须多思考，多写不如多改，多改不如多想，当然这种想不是fantasy或者daydream。而是针对写作思路和自我总结。总结越多考试就越顺手。

GRE写作提高技巧六：拿下全部GRE作文题库

必须看GRE的全部题库，不要抱侥幸心理，在考试之前找到文章中出现的逻辑错误，远比在30min中为它而浪费时间值得的多。

GRE写作提高技巧七：与朋友同学进行交流

必须多交流，听听大家的意见，有益无害。收集不同人对于某些ISSUE的观点和看法，转化成自己的东西，本身也是一种对素材的储备过程。

GRE写作提高技巧八：准备出自己的GRE作文例子

必须要有自己的例子。没有哪个考官会喜欢几百号人都说Van Gogh， Einstein，Curie。要结合自身经历，准备一些比较独家又有代表性的例子。

GRE作文范文：laws

GRE写作练习题目：laws

It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people'sbehavior， but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what isin people's hearts and minds.

通过法律可以控制或者限制人们的行为，但是立法是无法改变人类本性的。法律无法改变人们的感情和思想。

GRE写作范文：

Ever since the Code of Hammurapi comes into being， laws have begun to putrestrictions on people's behaviors and have played an important role in themaintenance of social order. But aside from its impact on shaping publicdeportment， legislation is of no avail to reform human nature as well as mankindthoughts.

Our collective life experience is that we make choices and decisions everyday--under a legal system. No one is ever granted the rights to surpass theboundary of laws; otherwise there may be lack of protection for private propertyand personal right from being violated. Common sense tells us that the laws willpunish the wrongdoers severely sometimes so harshly even to sentence the felonsto death. It is the awe to controlling authority as well as the fear ofcastigation that made most of the people away from the illicit behaviors. Laws，for better or worse， have put up a paradigm on which people abide by， for thesake of personal interests and the social stability as well.

Laws can exert their influences on people's “hands and legs”， but when itcomes to man's hearts and minds， it cannot. In the long history of itsdevelopment， laws change over time and vary from region to region not to alterhuman nature but to be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances，times and places. The end of a legal system impels laws to evolve to keep pacewith changing mores， customers， and our collective sense of equity but withlittle concern for the reconstruction of human thoughts. Bigamy， to be commonlyregarded as illegal in most countries， is yet legitimate in some Arabiancountries. For Islamic， outlawing bigamy seems an impinge upon their religiousfreedom of choosing mates. Instead of bringing about a revolution in theconception of marriage among Islamic disciples， laws give way to the entrenchedcustomers. Still more， from the psychotic analysis angle， that laws will changenature is further doubted. Sigmund Freud has divided the individual personalityinto threefold：
the id， the ego and the super ego. The ego， as the surface ofthe nature and the part you show the world， is governed by the “realityprinciple，” otherwise known as laws.

However， so powerless are laws to extend its impacts on the id and thesuperego remains below， each has its own significant effects on the personality.A rapist， for example， despite years of imprisonment may still relapse intooutrages in that laws fail to civilize the id desires composing of instinctualdrives. By no means can laws alone alter our nature. Were laws by itself be ableto cause a change in the human nature and exercise a fundamental influence onpeople's hearts and minds， then it would probably be no need for its existence.People at no time can ever have imagined this.

In fact， to truly change the human nature， it is through the synergicefforts associating the education， moral and ethic social interactionsaltogether that brought about a reconstruction of human nature.

In conclusion， in spite the fact that we may live in a harmonious societywith the implementation of the laws， it seems unthinkable for laws to undertakethe role as a reformer in rebuilding man's nature as well as hearts andminds.

GRE作文范文：多媒体教育

Although innovations such as video，computers，and the Internet seem to offerschools improved methods for instructing students，these technologies all toooften distract from real learning.

GRE作文范文参考：

Nowadays there is a growing concern about the role that innovations haveplayed in the field of learning. While most people think that innovationsbenefit learning process in various ways，different opinions arise that thesetechnology advancements actually distract students from real learning. Onbalance，according to my personal observation，whether innovations can bebeneficial or detrimental to real learning depends on the students and theteachers，not on these innovations themselves.

To begin with，technological innovations do help teaching and learning invarious ways.With the aid of these technologies，the process of teaching andlearning can be shorter and easier than before. For instance，if a student wantcertain published papers of an academic discipline，he/she may look throughconsiderable catalogs to find the ones he/she needs. However，with the help ofInternet innovation，at present most of these papers are published online.Consequently，to find certain paper the procedure is much easier and shorter， thestudents just type the key words and other information of the paper，and then thesystem will search the database，and the papers are there waiting for them. Asthis new approach can save a lot of time for the students，he/she could have moretime reading the papers and absorbing the knowledge rather than checking andlooking for the papers that could be a waste of his/her time. This example aptlyillustrates how technology advancement benefited the students and their learningprocess.

Secondly，while innovations can help learning in various ways，it is moreimportant that the central role of the pursuit for knowledge and wisdoms aremaintained. What real matters is not the approach but the purpose of learning.In India，where modern technologies are less applied to the learning process thanin the US and other developed countries，still a lot of distinguished studentsachieved their academic goal with their hard work and desires to knowledge. Inthe US，where the software engineering students are given the most advancedfacilities and apparatus for their learning and research，however，it is wildlyaccepted that they are far less outstanding compared to the Indian students ofsoftware，who may share computers in groups. From this comparison we can see thatthe real and core push of learning is the desire for knowledge，not the help ofinnovations.

In addition，if not guided properly，the technology advancement might inhibitlearning.In other words，innovation can distract the students from real learningthan helping them. It is obvious that a computer can help students of science tocalculate mathematical equations but can also be used for recreation such as netsurfing or computer games. It is highly possible that these students can spendmore time and energy on recreations rather than learning when using a computer.Thus，learning is inhibited. Under this circumstance，guidance and restrictionsare needed to ensure the right use of innovations for learning，or theconsequence may be on the contrary to the students and teachers' desire.

To conclude，technological innovations are beneficial to learning in manyways，but when using these technologies，one should not forget the real purpose oflearning and remember not to be distracted for other usages of these innovationsthat are irrelevant or detrimental to learning. On balance，innovation hereserves as a double-edges sword，and its right use is dependent on the studentsand the teachers.

英语写作相关文章：